Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque M, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Yards, Velez Garcia-Nieto A great, Isla-Tejera B
90 days) between your history lookup time additionally the full book day. Using this advice, journals must look into asking for authors off SRs to help you change its literature research before allowed of your own SRs. SR profiles must ascertain the time slowdown within past look go out of the studies so evidence are up-to-go out for productive logical decision-to make.
Sources
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Scientific analysis for the health care a functional guide. Inside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Force,; 2001: 1 on line financing (148 p.).
Chalmers I. Part 24: using medical product reviews and you will data off lingering examples having medical and you can ethical demo build, overseeing, and you can revealing. In: Egger Meters, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Clinical product reviews for the healthcare : meta-investigation within the context. second ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj, Jones DR. Research synthesis while the the answer to even more defined and you may successful lookup. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Is logical product reviews right up-to-go out during guide? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36.
Palese A good, Coletti S, Dante Good. Publication overall performance one of several large effect factor breastfeeding publications last year: an effective retrospective analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most systematic analysis had written during the higher-impact publications did not check kissbridesdate.com check out here in the new protocols: a beneficial meta-epidemiological analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;60.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen M, Elo S, Kyngas H. The newest methodological top-notch logical ratings wrote during the large-impression medical magazines: a look at the fresh new literature. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty-two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Training equipment inside the research centered behavior: evaluation out-of reusable understanding objects (RLOs) to have learning about meta-data. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Cock sucking, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is actually a reliable and appropriate dimension unit to assess the new methodological quality of scientific studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Yards, Vallve Odena Meters, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A good, Jeric Yards, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Meters, Poklepovic Pericic T, et al. Methodological and you can revealing quality of systematic studies wrote in the high ranking guides in the area of soreness. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The quality of scientific analysis available procedures: a diagnosis using AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Virtual assistant, Sharif MO. An AMSTAR review of methodological top-notch clinical product reviews out-of oral healthcare interventions typed in the journal out-of used oral technology (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):440seven.
Logical feedback and you will meta-analyses into psoriasis: character of capital source, disagreement of great interest and you can bibliometric indicator given that predictors from methodological quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):163349.
Brandt JS, Downing Air conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Pass classics for the obstetrics and you can gynecology: the new 100 most often cited log articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1seven.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Meters, Tam WW, Tang J. Shipping and epidemiological properties out-of published individual patient study meta-analyses. PLoS You to definitely. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Affirmation of PRISMA report and quality of systematic recommendations and meta-analyses authored in breastfeeding guides: a corner-sectional data. BMJ Unlock. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Cock sucking, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Yards, Andersson Letter, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai An excellent, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. External recognition of a measurement product to assess logical feedback (AMSTAR). PLoS That. 2007;2(12):e1350.
This entry was posted on Miércoles, abril 16th, 2025 at 1:26 am
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Posted in: e-mail order bride